Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Writer's Memoir



A  Writer’s Memoir

So.  A writer’s memoir.  It begs the question, at least to my mind, what is a writer?  Generally, I tend to think of a writer as the author of books, poems, scripts, magazines articles, etc.  My definition of a writer is that of someone who is paid for their work: one thinks of someone like Stephen King, Toni Morrison, or prolific SF author Alastair Reynolds:  you know, people with money who smile a lot, and who go to the bank to cash fat advances from major publishers.  And then there are the unpublished writers: students with term-papers, bloggers, occasional poets, writers on bathroom walls, and all the rest of us who can tap out words on a keyboard or put a pencil to paper: do they count too?  If we consider a writer as somebody who enjoys writing, who feels a certain urge to write, who tosses off poems, essays, and short stories  every once in a while, then I suppose I too would be counted as a writer. 
            Not that that’s something I would put on a resume, understand.   I’ve written three (as of yet unpublished) novels, a plethora of poems (and even had one published in a magazine), and a kazillion papers on a variety of subjects over the course of my university career (and here I am doing it again!).  I’ve got a whole folder in my filing cabinet entitled “rejection slips” (the mark of a “real” writer if ever there was one!).  I’ve written speeches, reference letters, and a series of articles on Korean culture for the English language newspaper The Korean Times.  I even minored in writing when I got my Bachelor’s degree.
I’ve heard a lot of complaints about writing throughout my lifetime, mostly from people who find it drudgery, but I never found it so.  Writing is a pleasure, and something I take some pains to do correctly and well.    Generally, people seem to think my pieces are entertaining and or at least worth reading, and I take a certain amount of satisfaction in that, so that’s something as well.   Of course, perhaps they were just being polite. 
            Personally, I don’t enjoy reading people writing about writing.  The skill itself (and it is a skill, and one that requires a good bit of practice at that!) is so subjective: what works for one person does not work for others.  Also, what is good writing to some people is bad writing to others:  I distinctly remember throwing my copy of James Joyce’s Ulysses hard against the wall in my disgust at the density of its prose.  Generally, learned people consider it a classic, and well written: well, I beg to differ.  
            Like I said, I don’t enjoy reading about people writing about their writing.  If you’re like me, so feel free to stop here if you choose, because I’m going to talk a bit about how I write. 
           When given an assignment to write about something, the first thing I do is sleep on it.  And then I walk on it.  Not literally of course, but a text is organic, and so I give it time to grow within my mind and assume vague contours.  Writing, after all, is a mental thing.  The text itself is muscle memory pressing keys upon a keyboard, but the writing itself is one’s thoughts crystalized and made manifest for anyone and their brother to see.  So I give my writing time and space to grow and breathe, to become alive for me.  I often wake up at night with ideas for the paper, or as I’ve trudging along on the hour-long walk I do daily, I talk to myself and try ideas out to see how they sound.  Only after the idea is more or less fleshed out in my mind, with a beginning, an end, and some ideas about what I’m going to say do I actually boot up the computer and begin to write.  Sometimes, however, ideas take years to germinate.  For instance, my (as of yet!) unpublished novel The Buddha Smiles. 
This work sat in my brain for months until the time was right.  I was in Korea at the time, and spending a lot of time in Korean Buddhist temples.  I would watch the bowing and chanting shaven-head monks pound away at their fish-shaped drums, I would look at thousand-year-old temples floating in a cool morning mist, I would bow to the stone pagodas, and most importantly in this context, I would look at the paintings that adorned the temple walls, sometimes ten or more to a shrine.  They were not random, these paintings, as they often told stories that began at the door and wrapped themselves around the entire circumference of the building.  Some of these stories / picture series  include the eight (sometimes ten) ox-herding pictures that are an allegory of the process of Enlightment, scenes of the torments of Buddhist Hell, Korean / Zen cultural stories, and other besides.  One of the most important stories the temple walls told told was the life-story of the Buddha, beginning at his birth ending at this death.  And looking that the story gave me an idea: I would write a biography of the Buddha’s life seen through the eyes of the people that surrounded him.  So that’s what I did.  And each chapter, each new set of eyes, required me to walk with that person, and “interview” her to get her story down correctly.   It took me months to write the 51 chapter, 400 page manuscript, but it was, creatively, one of the best periods of my life. 
Other writing does not require huge lengths of time.  My other (also unpublished) novel, which was also written in Korea, is called The Goddess of Dragon, and it took much less time.  I had an idea for a planet, just kind of a mental exercise, which was originally supposed to be a memory palace of sorts.  I didn’t know much about my location, but I knew it was a massive planet on par with Jupiter that was populated with many different races all of whom lived together in a Utopian society.  The planet was called Dragon because there were only two continents, an upper and a lower with the massive ocean between them: from space: it looked like a ball of jagged teeth.  I drew a map of it, and then I realized that there not just aliens there: humans were there too.  How did they get there?  I started to wonder about that, and I walked with it, and after a few days, I knew the answer.   And once I had the answer to that, I had the whole history of the human race upon the planet, and the novel was pretty much full-grown within my head like Athena squirming about in the brainpan of Zeus.   The rough draft of it was 150 pages, and only took me two weeks.
I’ve always loved the idea of being a writer.  I remember when I was very young, I wrote a short play with Dracula, Wolfman, and Frankenstein sharing a castle.   My teacher asked to see it, but I can’t remember what she said about it.  In my first year of university, in my very early 20s, I wrote my first attempt at long fiction.  Fragments, which, unlike my other long fiction, I have since totally abandoned as being unpublishable melodramatic garbage, took its name from T.S. Eliot’s famous poem “The Wasteland” (part five): “These fragments I have shored against my ruins”.  It involved an old woman, who, as she lay dying, saw her (oh so tragic!) life in a series of stream-of–consciousness fragments, all of which grew shorter and shorter as her mind started to dissolve and break down.  The first third were chapter-length fragments and made more or less linear sense, the second third were generally out-of-snyc paragraphs as she was become mentally disordered in time, and the final third were only three to five lines at a time and made no logical sense.  The final pages were short sentence fragments, and the final lines simple words. At the time I wrote it, I thought I was being deep.  Now I realize the word would probably be pretentious.
                Still, Fragments gave me a taste of what I could do as a writer.  I realized that this was something I truly enjoyed, and while I was not necessarily skilled at it, it was something I could see myself getting good at someday with practice. So that’s what I did, I practiced.  I had some limited success: a poem published in a small underground press (which paid in a single copy), and some articles in the newspaper in Korea.  Yet real, tangible success has thus far managed to elude me.  More practice, I guess.  But that okay, as I’m a patient person.   
                Turning to the computer, I bring up MS Word and find my manuscript for The Goddess Of Dragon.  I take a long moment to look at it reflectively, chewing at my lips.  I hit the print button and have lunch while I wait for the 400 pages of my novel to print out.  When it finished (still warm from the printer…), I place the heavy manuscript into a box and take it to the post office.  I give it to the clerk, and watch my manuscript disappear into the bowels of the post office on its way to a publishing company.  Maybe this time?  Hope, as they say, springs eternal.  I turn, walk out, go home.   
               
                               
                                               
           
                          

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Unknown Genre: Reflection

 
Of all the things we've done in this class, the "unknown genre project” was the one thing I was most excited about.  My only problem was to pick a genre that was, well, "unknown".  See, I'm a reader, and have been one all my life: a day without me reading a book of some sort is a very unusual one indeed.  I've got hundreds of books in my personal library on all sorts of subjects ranging from science to math to literature to history.  Most of all, however, I enjoy books in the science fiction genre: at any given time, I’ve probably got at least one SF book in the backpack I carry around with me at all times, and if I don’t have an actual book, I have either the latest  Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine, or Fantasy and Science Fiction Magazine, both of which I subscribe to. 
            So when it came to picking an unknown genre, I was a little stumped, seeing as I’ve got some experience with many kinds of genres.  I considered romance, but gave that idea up pretty quickly as being  wrong for me.  The same with mysteries: I don’t like them and never have.  I love science fiction, and I thought about doing something in that genre, but what?  And then it came to me: steampunk.   
            Steampunk has been around for about 30-40 years, but as genres go, it’s fairly new.  I’d read about it in a vague way in the SF columns, even read some unknowingly.   But in the end, it was just a term I kept stumbling across again and again, but I hadn’t a clue as to what it really was: thus, I chose it as my unknown genre.     
            In some ways, this was an easy project for me, and in some ways, it was difficult.  
            I was able to find some very good steampunk anthologies at the local Barnes and Noble: I chose anthologies rather than novels figuring that they would give me a multi-textured bird’s eye view of the genre from the viewpoint of many writers as opposed to just a few.  I assumed I would enjoy what I read, and I was correct: I found both value and pleasure in my consumption of the genre: thus, did I squirrel away many happy hours trudging upon the muddy London streets breathing in that peaty smoke-filled air and dodging carriages, airships, and robots alike.  By the time I was done with the reading part of the project, I’d read over 25 short stories and one novel, and still I hungered for more.  But who has time?  There are those pesky term papers to do…  
 I began the project with the question: what is steampunk?  The answer is, in a nutshell, history and technology combined.  Steampunk is alternative Victorian-era history, of course, but alternative history is history, if only for the time it takes to read the story.  And once I had the answer to my question, I was able to start my own steampunk piece. 
Writing my own piece was a little more difficult than my reading in the genre.  The Victorian era was a very long period of time filled with very important people and concepts.   In all that, what was I to focus upon?  Unable to come up with a totally original concept, I instead chose to “rewrite” a literary legend, namely Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s exhumation of his wife’s remains to retrieve a book of poems he had buried with her.   In the late 80s, I was able to go to London, and while there, I visited the Tate Gallery where the original Pre-Raphaelite paintings are displayed, and also the overgrown Highgate cemetery where both Karl Marx and Elizabeth Siddal are buried; thus, I had some visual details in the back of my mind while I was rewriting the story from a steampunk perspective.  Along the way, I also retroactively reengineered our American history: in my story, the South wins the American Civil war, and the General-Shermanesque Abraham Lincoln is a far cry from the “Great Emancipator” that we know and revere today.   Once I had the concept of the story and had worked out a general outline, it was just a matter of putting my fingers to the keyboard and writing it out. 
Another difficult part of the project was writing the “how-to” book.  Steampunk is so new, there aren’t that many resources devoted to the history of the genre.  Thankfully, I was able to find some in the print sources I had purchased, and once I had that piece of my puzzle, I was all set to begin the writing part of it.  I decided to do “the book” via a powerpoint presentation, and that led to another difficulty: I’d learned how to do powerpoints on a Korean version of the program, and much to my dismay, I quickly found that things are different in the American version.  It was touch-and-go there for a while, but I was able to make thing work out (I’m more digital literate than I thought!).  It wasn’t as pretty as I would have liked, but I prefer stark-and-simple to confused-and cluttered-with-annoying-sound-effects-and-visuals any day.   
One of the things I love about steampunk and science fiction in general is the total freedom in which to play.  A SF playground is much wider and deeper than that of normal fiction.  Take E.M. Forester’s A Room with a View for instance, one of my favorite books.  The writer can do what he likes with Cecil and Lucy, but he is ultimately bound by time (in this case, the Edwardian Era), place (Italy and England) and humanity, by which I mean the limits of being human.  A steampunk writer has no such constraints upon him: he can change the location-details and the circumstances of the time at whim.  As for humanity, one of SF’s greatest assets is being able to show the reader “alternative humanity”.  An example of this is Ursula Le Guin’s rightly famous novel The Left Hand Of Darkness, where an alien race similar to humans can change gender over time. 
SF has a lot to say about us, things that we can’t say easily, prettily, or happily otherwise, and that is a definite strength. In my writing workshops at Novi High School, the teacher has been focusing on Bradbury and Clarke, and I hope that I will be able to do the same: SF offers choice and alternatives to students in their writings that other writings do not.    
I didn’t really find out anything “new” about myself doing the unknown genre project, but I confirmed and strengthened things that I suspected all along: things such my worth as a writer, being able to teach writing to students and make it enjoyable, and that the SF genre offers a myriad of possibilities both as a reader and writer.   “Ophelia, Drowning” was not my first toe in the water of genre writing, but it gives me confidence that I have it in me to do more of it, and do it well at that. 

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Unknown Genre: Writing in the Genre ("a published piece...")




For the “published piece that explains either about how to write in that Genre or how to teaching writing in that genre” part of the unknown genre project, I read “HOW TO I WRITE A STEAMPUNK STORY”  by Dru Pagliassotti on the “Steamed! Writing Steampunk Fiction” website.  


A lot of what the author said is kind of obvious to anyone who has read a good bit of the fiction (as I have myself by this point).   He did, however, make two very interesting points.  

One is that a Steampunk piece must have two things to be an authentic steampunk story.  One is “steam” (Victorian-era technology) and the other is “punk”, (rebellion or defiance).  If either element is missing, according to this author, then what you have is “steampulp” instead.   Somewhat like calling the “Star Wars” movies “Science Fantasy” instead of Science Fiction, one might think.  “Pulp” brings to mind images of black and white SF movies from the 50s, or the stories one might read in “Fantasy and Science Fiction Magazine” in the 40s.   That’s not necessarily a bad thing, nor do we need to slice our steampunk definition so thinly in my opinion.  There is room for both “real” Steampunk and steampunk-inspired stores in my universe (both kinds of which I’ve read), and as long as they’re written well, who cares about the exact definition?  That is what I was thinking as I was reading through the article, and in fact, by the end of it, Mr. Paglassotti says pretty much the same thing. 

The other thing I want to mention is the following: Mr. Paglossotti says “The challenge is that a number of these elements have become clichés…”  something I wholeheartedly agree with.  I would think it would be very easy to write bad steampunk.  Does a pair of goggles or an airship make a genre story?   Generally, I don’t think so.  But again, it comes back to the quality of the writing: written well enough, a  pair of dusty goggles and / or a high flying balloon might just be enough.  While I write this paragraph, I think of Stanley Kim Robinson’s “Mars” series.  In one of them, (either Red Mars or Green Mars, but not Blue Mars), two of the 100 colonialists who went to Mars are traveling across the planet by dirigible doing science stuff.  While the “Mars” series is Hard SF (and very annoyingly hard SF, at that), in retrospect, that scene in the balloon travelling across the red and rock wastelands of Mars, where the red dust is getting everywhere, is very steampunk-like even though the book itself is not “steamy” at all.